Page 15 - June 20, 2024 Bulletin
P. 15

Rob Nichols
                           President and CEO
                           American Bankers Association
                           nichols@aba.com





                                                           Washington Update




        The ‘Other’ CRA: A Lesser-Known Tool in the Policy Toolbox



        The banking agencies are tasked with writing implementing   Congress passed CRA resolutions three more times during
        regulations for the laws enacted by Congress, but they do   the  Biden  administration,  and  lawmakers  continue  to
        not have free reign. In creating these rules, regulators must   introduce them. Recently, ABA supported a CRA challenge
        act within the boundaries of their statutory authority or run   to the CFPB’s 1071 final rule. That CRA challenge was passed
        the risk of legal challenge—and ABA has not been afraid to   by a bipartisan majority in both the House and Senate – and
        hold them accountable in court when they get it wrong. But   though President Biden ultimately vetoed the measure, it
        Congress can also hold agencies accountable when there   sent a strong and clear signal that Congress disagreed with
        are policy disagreements by simply overriding final rules.  the bureau’s rule.

        In ABA’s view, regulators have exceeded their authority in   In addition, a resolution of disproval under the CRA was also
        several recent regulatory actions, including the 1071 final   passed  in  May  to  invalidate  the  Securities  and  Exchange
        rule, the credit card late fee final rule, the new Community   Commission’s Staff Accounting Bulletin 121, which changed
        Reinvestment Act final rule, and the expansion of UDAAP   the way that banks and other publicly traded entities are
        authority via an update to an examination manual.       expected to account for digital assets held in custody. ABA
        When  I  addressed  bankers  at  the  2024  ABA  Washington   is also supporting a CRA challenge to the CFPB’s recently
        Summit earlier this year, I  assured  them that ABA  would   finalized  credit  card  late  fee  rule.  The  House  Financial
        use every tool in our toolbox to push back against the   Services Committee favorably reported that resolution of
        “regulatory tsunami” that regulators have unleashed upon   disapproval in April.
        the banking  industry. Litigation  is obviously  a tool that   The Congressional Review Act is so powerful because
        we’ve been forced to use now several times – as evidenced   resolutions can move to the Senate floor quickly through
        by our four current legal challenges against bank regulators   an expedited “fast track” procedure and that, once on the
        – but it isn’t the only option.                         floor, a resolution requires only a
        Among  the  other  tools  available  is  a  lesser-known   simple majority  vote to pass – not 60  votes, like most
        mechanism called the Congressional Review Act—which we   legislation.  This  fast-track  process  stipulates  a  specific
        sometimes refer to as “the other CRA.”                  timeframe during which rules issued in this Congress can be
        The  Congressional  Review  Act  was  enacted  in  1996  to   invalidated by the next Congress: the rule must be issued
        provide Congress with an avenue for overturning certain   during a window of 60 session or legislative days prior to
        federal regulatory actions, but inexperience with the new   Congress’ adjournment at the end of the year in order for
        law and divided government meant it was only used once in   the next Congress to have an opportunity to invalidate the
        its first 21 years. During the Trump administration, however,   rule. We are now nearing the window where any final rules
        when Congress and the White House were controlled by    that are issued by the agencies could be challenged under
        the same party, the CRA was used successfully 16 times.   the CRA in the next Congress – yet another reason why
        Highlights included ABA-backed resolutions to overturn   electoral outcomes matter.
        the CFPB’s rule effectively banning the use of mandatory   However the elections shake out in November, ABA’s focus
        arbitration for financial products – a rule that ABA strongly   will remain unchanged: supporting a policy environment
        opposed  –  and  a  resolution  to  nullify  the  bureau’s  2013   that supports America’s banks in their mission to supply
        indirect auto lending guidance, after the Government    credit to their customers, clients and communities. And
        Accountability Office issued a formal decision in 2017 that   we’ll  continue  to  use  every  tool  in  the  toolbox  to  ensure
        the guidance constituted a rule.                        that our broad and diverse banking sector can continue to
                                                                thrive.







                                                             15
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20