Page 32 - December 19. 2024 Bulletin
P. 32

BUSINESS PARTNERfeature article


          Repercussions of



          Tax Policy Changes



          for Municipal Bonds






                                                                     Dana Sparkman, CFA
                                                                        Senior Vice President/
                                                                            Municipal Analyst
                                                                             The Baker Group



        looming expiration of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of   This means that broad market demand is predominantly
        2017 and Republicans in narrow control.  While it is too   driven by individuals rather than corporations. Assuming
        early to know concrete tax plans from President-Elect Trump’s   individual tax rates are not further cut, individuals should
        second term, we have some insight into what he would like   still have strong demand for tax-exempt income. However,
        to implement as stated on the campaign trail, including the   entities subject to the corporate tax rate may continue to
        following:                                                struggle to find value in tax-exempt municipal bonds.
          •   Extend most provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act   Threatened Tax Exemption
              (TCJA) of 2017, except the State and Local Tax (SALT)
              deduction cap may be raised or eliminated.          The ability to obtain tax-exempt financing is a tremendous
          •   Lower the corporate tax rate to 20% generally, and to   benefit for state and local governments. However, municipal
              15% for domestic manufacturers.                     market experts caution that this benefit may be vulnerable
                                                                  due to tax cuts coupled with the recent focus on the national
          •   Exempt income derived from tips, overtime pay, and   debt. The Tax Foundation reports that if all tax proposals
              social security from taxes.                         touted on Trump’s campaign trail were enacted, the effect

        How these items will be paid for is largely a guessing game at   would be a $3 trillion increase in the 10-year budget deficit.
        this point, but municipal market participants worry that possible   Eliminating the tax exemption on all municipal bonds
        “pay-for” options may harm the municipal market. Some key   could offset about $36 billion per year according to the
        potential impacts on the municipal bond market are discussed   Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. That is a small
        below.                                                    amount in exchange for being detrimental to financing of
                                                                  local infrastructure. Therefore, it seems unlikely this will
           Demand                                                 happen.

           The common theme of Trump’s wish list is a low tax burden   A more likely scenario is that a segment of the municipal
           on American taxpayers and companies. All else equal,   market may lose its eligibility to issue tax-exempt bonds
           demand for tax-exempt income diminishes as tax rates   similar to the way advance refunding bonds were obstructed
           fall.  Individual tax rates are currently expected to remain at   by the TCJA in 2017. Private Activity Bonds (PABs) were
           present levels (top rate of 37%), and general corporate tax   considered for repeal of the tax exemption when the TCJA
           rates may fall slightly from 21% to 20%.               was passed, but ultimately retained their tax exemption for
                                                                  qualified purposes then.  PABs are likely to be targeted again.
           SIFMA data shows that over 70% of municipal bonds      Legislators may look to other segments, such as hospitals or
           are held by individuals and mutual funds rather than by   colleges, as additional options to repeal the tax exemption
           corporate taxpayers, as shown in the chart below. This was   and raise revenue. Borrowing costs would rise for any issuers
           the case even before the TCJA slashed corporate tax rates.   that lose the ability to issue tax-exempt bonds, which could




                                                             32
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37